A weblog carrying an entry with the abovementioned subject has raised a valid issue regarding the attempt of Mr. Waathiq and his attorney to send a cease and desist order to google. com regarding copyright infringments as described per DMCA. We ask ourselves whether this attorney of Kronenberger & Associates will be paid by Mr. Waathiq (or WebTops) or whether Mr. Kronenberger will end up on the list of creditors like many other attorneys who were not paid by Mr. Waathiq for their past services.

It is interesting to note that Mr. Kronenberger is also a member of the management team at WebTops. You can read more about the link between Mr. Kronenberger and Mr. Waathiq on this page. We need to conclude that, if Mr. Kronenberger has written the content of the cease and desist notice, then Mr. Kronenberger is probably an attorney that does not do his homework before putting any claims in writing.

If Mr. Waathiq had properly informed Mr. Kronenberger about this site then Mr. Waathiq would have certainly told him that cease and desist notices will not bring the results that Mr. Waathiq desires because we are able to move any content to any location at any time. Unless Mr. Waathiq and Mr. Kronenberger are interested in sending hundreds of cease and desist notices each week to the many search engines for every additional incarnation of this site it seems that they are wasting their time with frivolous notices to google.com.

Mr. Waathiq also didn't seem to care to inform his attorney that the site www.worldwidewarning.net and davidwaathiq.worldwidewarning.net are not the same legal entity that he wishes to hold responsible and/or liable.

We have evidence that Mr. Waathiq is aware of that and as such have to question the accuracy of his cease and desist notice. Mr. Waathiq is well aware which party he can address regarding the worldwidewarning site but we also know that Mr. Waathiq does not wish to dispense with the resources to follow up on that.

We also know that Mr. Waathiq is afraid to take the legal action he would like to take (and has claimed many times before he had, has, or will be taking) because he would be dealing with matters way out of his league. We therefore conclude that the claim that our host, WWW, being operated anonymously is untrue and incorrect like many other claims and comments Mr. Waathiq regularly puts in writing.

Mr. Waathiq has conveniently forgotten that those who created much of the content and material of which he now suddenly claims to own the copyright to were never paid and as such are still the original copyright owners (unless Mr. Waathiq wishes to prove otherwise by showing the contracts, transactions, and payments instead of bouncing checks drawn on his wife's account).

But we suspect that Mr. Waathiq has not disclosed any of those details to his attorney because it would not be in his best interest to do so. We have to conclude that once again this is another misguided attempt by Mr. Waathiq to bring down the exposure of his activities, this time by claiming copyright under the DMCA based on material that does not belong to any legal entity other than the nebulous claim that Mr. Waathiq is that legal entity.